So, you are consider a Theist? One who believes in a deity (God or gods) and not necessarily means the God of the bible.. Please tell us, which gods do you believe? Or, are you reffering to the God of the bible? But you deny the concepts of Christianity? How can you believe God (God of the bible) and deny Christianity? Do you know what Christianity teaches anyway? I doubt it.. Well, please state your position clearly..

So, you are an atheist and you dont believe in any god nor creator. Are you a strong or weak atheist? Or just an atheist who simply lacks the belief in god of any sort?

Since you said that you dont believe in God or a creator, i assume you lack belief in God as opposing to one who claim to know "there is no God". So why is it that you do not believe in God?

But you didnt explain why you dont believe in God. I gave you many reason why i believe in God and provided you with some evidence. Now its you who have to explain why you dont believe in God.

I dont see any good reasons to deny God or the supernatural from you. You havent give your explaination why you reject a belief in God. This is the second time. LOL!

Really? Thats an easy statement to make. So how'd you figured? Based on our past conversation, you know nothing about the Christian God and His charateristcs. So you simply cannot make that statement. The Christian God is a personal God that intervene in human affairs. Give me one or two example sthe Christian God is like other "gods". But again, i still dont see any good reasons to deny the existence of God from you. You dont realy believe that do you? Explain.

And i agreed. But just becuase science can explain natural things so therefore, there is no God? Science doesnt prove nor disprove God. But if a person wants to take science to a theological and philosophical issue then it can prove God. Sometimes science does contain flaws becuase were unable to interpret the facts. Its not fighting about the facts. The facts is not the problem. The problem is how we interpret those facts base on our own presupposition worldview.

Science hold skepticism but why arent they skeptical about the evolution theory huh? In science, you can challenge everything in the Polygenetic Tree, but u dare NOT challenge the theory of evolution. Thats how well the theory is protected. There is no evidence for macroevolution of how one animal evolve into a new one. Nobody has never observe that happening.

Do you believe reptiles evolved into birds? How does their complexed scale structure changed into feather? The information in the genome doesnt have that code you know? In fact, genetic information in the gene pool always have limitation. So when YOU or any scientist believes that reptile turn to birds, they are speculating. That can only take place in their mind not in reality. We know that God created them after its own kind. There might be a few changes but these changes are limited. You dont plant corn and get watermelon. How in the world do they teach that we humans are related to a banana? This is dumb. Tobacco has 46 chromosomes too, so does that mean if we came from tabacco? And if we keep on evolving then we'll become more uglier right? Do you know how this theory makes you more dumber? You need to take some time off and think.

Of course science is limited. No scientist knows 80% of all there is to know. To know 100% of everything that there is, means you would have to be at all places at all time. But this is impossible.
So what makes you think that God does not exist? Do you have evidence that disprove the existence of God? Lets hear it if you have some.

The Christian God is a personal God that relates to you in the person of Jesus Christ. If you have a desire to know God and His love for you, then you first have to know Jesus Christ. You're going to have to understand what Christ taught and did. This comes from revelation which is something i or anybody cannot give you. You going to have to seek yourself. That is how many people come to know God. You cant just rely on science. You going to have to open your heart to God and open the bible and read it just as the same way you would read a science article or a journal.

You have so much hope in science and that you will not believe unless you can empirically test God right? Well, i tell you what: eventhough that may be a good line of reasoning and may seen logical... it has one servere problem. It is self-defeating. For you cannot empirically test your own statement that God does not exist either, or if something is true or not. So therefore, i dont know if what ur saying is true. You know what i mean? Eventhough empirical testing is a great tool, to say that it is the only way to know truth is incorrect. Im not saying that you say this. Im just making a point here. In fact, we can know truth without empirical testing cuz we do it everyday. This is called induction - where we draw conclusion through specific observation. And i know you accept alot of the things you cant explain. Even in the absence of God, you could be living your life pretending everything is "ok" right? LOL! So i still dont see any good reason to reject God. Its more truthful to accept and believe rather than not to believe. Can you empirically test that science is truth and is the only way?

Then that is up to you. Whether you believe it or not doesnt disprove God. Other pple believes it becuase it is more truthful to them. And not just becuase of faith but becase there are compelling evidence for it. Maybe they find it more easy to reconcile science and faith, faith and reason etc... maybe its just hard for you to reconcile the two. Why do some pple see it and some dont? I'll be back and discuss this more with you.