Navigation
User login
Status
User Created Poll
Who's online
Online users
Richard Dawkin Got STUMPED by Creationist question
Fellows, Richard Dawkins is a leading well known Atheistic Evolutionist today. Look at the way he got STUMPED by creationist question. LOL! Talking about long ago far away "million of years" ago? First of all, he wasnt there to observe the incident of what took place. Second, he is deluded in fairy tales of how fish walked on land. So please, dont called mine religious and your science? Must be a difficult thing for you to defend your atheistic position eh? Your answer does not even explain how evolution can increase in genetic information? Goodluck Richard.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zaKryi3605g
HPers, an example people would attempt to give as prove for evoluton, where mutation or evolutionary process which can be seen to increase genetic information is "Down syndrome". Down syndrome is a chromosomal disorder caused by having an extra 21st chromosome. The fact is, Down syndrome is not even a positive mutation. You need new genes for evolution to work. How can you even go from prokaryote to a eukaroyote without new genes? People who claim this as evidence or evolution did not give an example where new genes is added. Therefore, they failed.
Let me explain: Humans have 46 chomosomes which is 23 base pairs. Each base pairs of chromosomes is inherited from the father and one from the mother. Say "A" is father and "B" is mother. Down syndrome has 1 extra chromosome. A normal person has chromosome 21a and 21b.
People who have Down syndrome have 3 chromosomes: 21a, 21a, 21b. Note: There is no new chromosome. Only more of pre-existing information but not new information! Therefore, this kind of mutation DID NOT create new gene. The fact is: 21a was duplicated and Nothing NEW!
This process is called "Chromsome Duplication". However, a new organ and a new tissue in a living organism will never be created through this process. For example: a "fin" from a fish COULD NOThave evolved to a "leg" to a human. A "scale" from reptiles COULD NOT have evolved to a "feather" to a bird. Unfortunately, evolution DOES NOT work! And i just debunked this claim.
This fit well with the Creation model--> that God created different kinds of plants and animals which produce ONLY after it's kind! Nothing is getting better. Everything is tending decay, disorder and torn apart in the known universe even our human body--> 2nd law of Thermodynamics! Evolution is the opposite which real science does not support.

